Skip to main content
Opposed

Canada

Umbrella state (NATO)

Canada boycotted the negotiations on the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) in 2017 and has consistently voted against the annual UN General Assembly resolutions on the Treaty, including in 2025. It may sign and ratify or accede to the TPNW, but will have to make changes to its policies and practices to become compliant.

TPNW Status

SIGNATURE
DEPOSIT WITH UNSG
ENTRY INTO FORCE
DECLARATION
Key weapons of mass destruction treaties
NUCLEAR WEAPONS
Party to the TPNW No
Party to the NPT Yes (Ratified 1969)
Ratified the CTBT Yes (Ratified 1998, Annex 2 state)
Party to an NWFZ No
CSA with the IAEA Yes (In force 1972)
AP with the IAEA Yes (In force 2000)
BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Party to the BWC Yes (Ratified 1972)
Party to the CWC Yes (Ratified 1995)
TPNW Art. 1(1) prohibitions: Compatibility in 2025
(a) Develop, produce, manufacture, acquire Compatible
Possess or stockpile Compatible
Test Compatible
(b) Transfer Compatible
(c) Receive transfer or control Compatible
(d) Use Compatible
Threaten to use Compatible
(e) Assist, encourage or induce Non-compatible
(f) Seek or receive assistance Compatible
(g) Allow stationing, installation, deployment Compatible
TPNW voting and participation
UNGA resolution on TPNW (latest vote) Voted no (2025)
Participated in 3MSP (2025) No
Participated in 2MSP (2023) No
Participated in 1MSP (2022) No
Average MSP delegation size (% women) N/A
Adoption of TPNW (7 July 2017) N/A
Participated in TPNW negotiations (2017) No
Negotiation mandate (A/RES/71/258) Voted no
Fissile material
Nuclear facilities Yes
Fissile material production No
HEU stocks 1-10 tons
Plutonium stocks No
SQP with the IAEA No

Latest developments

In December 2024, in recognition of the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to the Japanese organisation Nihon Hidankyo, the House of Commons of Canada unanimously resolved to ‘acknowledge that hibakusha [atomic bomb survivors] have worked tirelessly for decades to raise awareness of the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons use’. The motion also encouraged the Canadian government to enhance its engagement with the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW).1

At the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) Preparatory Committee meeting in April 2025, Canada said that it remained ‘committed to achieving a world free of nuclear weapons’ and urged nuclear-weapon States to implement their disarmament obligations.2

‘As long as nuclear weapons exist, the world will remain at risk of their use, whether by design, miscalculation, or accident,’ it said. ‘The catastrophic humanitarian and environmental consequences of nuclear weapon use underscores the need for their irreversible elimination.’3

In the First Committee of the UN General Assembly in October 2025, Canada recalled the ‘horrific devastation and loss of life’ in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. ‘Eighty years later, nuclear weapons remain an existential threat to all of humanity,’ it said. ‘Despite decades of collective commitments, including through vital treaties and agreements, progress on nuclear disarmament has stalled, and may indeed be reversing.’4

In 2023, in response to a parliamentary petition urging Canada to ‘sign and commit to ratifying the TPNW’, the then-Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada, Mélanie Joly, said: ‘Canada recognizes that the entry into force of the [TPNW] reflects well-founded concerns about the slow pace of nuclear disarmament—concerns that Canada very much shares. While not a party to the TPNW, Canada has common ground with Treaty States and shares the ultimate goal of a world free from nuclear weapons.’5

Recommendations

  • Canada should renounce the possession and potential use of nuclear weapons on its behalf, and ensure that nuclear weapons do not have a role in its defence posture.

  • Canada should comply with its existing obligation under Article VI of the NPT and pursue negotiations in good faith on nuclear disarmament.

  • Canada should urgently adhere to the TPNW. Until it is in a position to do so, it should welcome the TPNW as a valuable component in the global disarmament and non-proliferation architecture, work with the Treaty's states parties on practical steps towards disarmament, and attend the meetings of states parties as an observer.

Can you help us update this state profile? Send e-mail
Did you find this interesting?
Print state profile